Ironically, I've learned a few genuinely helpful things from Clarkians. I'm not going to discuss those things in this post. Instead, I'm publishing my tongue-in-cheek observations about their debating techniques. Don't get bent out of shape, this is just for laughs. By God's grace, I can honestly say I love these guys more than I disagree with them (and we disagree rather thoroughly on some topics). In those disagreements, I've observed that these are the rules by which they play the game . . .
Debating Rules For Clarkians
1. If you insult the other guy, you've won.
1. If you insult the other guy, you've won.
We are of peace. Always.
2. If you quote Gordon Clark, you've won.
Surely he's the smartest guy who ever lived. Never made a mistake, either. Like Superman without the cape.
3. If you link the other guy's position to something in Roman Catholicism, no matter how contrived or unrelated, you've won.
Those Catholic heretics think the Trinity is a paradox, too. So it can't be true.
4. If you endlessly repeat the same argument he's already answered 20 times, you've won.
Pretend he didn't just wipe out your argument, and say it again as if it's the first time. If that doesn't work, try playing dumb. And repeating yourself. Repeating yourself is a good strategy. Repeating yourself is a good strategy. Repeating yourself is a good strategy (I must be winning!)
5. If you say he's irrational or illogical, you've won.
There are, after all, only two kinds of arguments. Perfectly sound Clarkian arguments and total irrationality. Only read Clarkian books and blogs. You can read other stuff if you're looking for something to attack, but not to learn anything.
6. If you quote John Robbins, you've won.
He's smaller than Guru Clark, but still a guaranteed winner. He works especially well with the Pope Card.
7. If the other guy responds to your argument, you've won. Same as if he doesn't respond.
Cover your ears whenever the heretic speaks!
8. If you declare him to be a Van Tillian, you've won.
Sure, Van Til was a genius who was firmly committed to Reformed orthodoxy. But why should that garner any respect? Never say his name without showing your utter disdain.
9. If you cite lopsided articles from the Trinity Review, you've won.
It's everything you'd want in a tabloid, minus the doctored up pictures of the people being tattled on.
10. If you can't derive everything you claim to know directly from Scripture, you've lost.
So if you don't happen to have a Biblical name, we don't know what to call you. In fact, you may not even exist.
Based on #10, they lose every time. But watching #1-9 keeps it entertaining.
